My guess would be that there is an adjoining building with a roof a few feet lower than the one he’s sitting on which is concealed by the camera angle, so he’s quite safe.
Apologies to the original creator, I didn’t mean to imply that they did it wrong. I was just saying I thought that they may have used a clever camera angle to make it appear that the model was in danger when he was actually quite safe. I’m hardly the one to criticise anyone else at the moment, out of 15 submissions I made in April and May only 2 have appeared on the site. My take at the moment is looking at successful submissions and trying to learn from them before I make any more of my own.
Thanks. I was aware at the time that some of the submissions imagining the type of ads we might be bombarded with in a NWO were a bit “alt” and may have landed outside the boundaries.
Considering how high that is without safety features, it is entirely beside the point that he’s naked.
My guess would be that there is an adjoining building with a roof a few feet lower than the one he’s sitting on which is concealed by the camera angle, so he’s quite safe.
If you have to add enough context that you deserve joint story credit, the original creator did it wrong.
Apologies to the original creator, I didn’t mean to imply that they did it wrong. I was just saying I thought that they may have used a clever camera angle to make it appear that the model was in danger when he was actually quite safe. I’m hardly the one to criticise anyone else at the moment, out of 15 submissions I made in April and May only 2 have appeared on the site. My take at the moment is looking at successful submissions and trying to learn from them before I make any more of my own.
About that… most likely I just kinda misplaced them. I’m sure many of them are great. I’ll try and get one of them up tonight.
Thanks. I was aware at the time that some of the submissions imagining the type of ads we might be bombarded with in a NWO were a bit “alt” and may have landed outside the boundaries.