Recent Comments

  • Mariner77 on Naked Aunt 1: Zack isn’t attracted to his aunt, why do you think he is? He is embarrassed by her.Dec 8, 07:13
  • Anonymous on Bad Service: Maybe they Haven’t given up the old health code of “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service “Dec 8, 03:17
  • MLC777 on Yellow Pants: Took a bit but you got the right answer: Go register full PN and completely give up the inconvenience of dealing with clothing.Dec 7, 17:49
  • NudeWorldOrder on Bad Service: I think she’s a little slow on the uptake. What happened here is obvious: She was wearing a coat outside under the cold weather exception, but then upon entering the restaurant she only opened it, instead of taking it off completely as required by law. The waiter is politely ignoring this infraction by pretending she just arrived and is still in the process of undressing. Were he to serve her while she’s still partly clothed that would make it far more obvious that she’s breaking the rules.Dec 7, 17:00
  • NudeWorldOrder on Discussion: I’m not sure what you’re talking about. If you were trying to reply to a specific comment, you need to use the reply link under it.Dec 7, 12:04
  • Soham Halder on Discussion: Names of any of them where i could find?Dec 7, 06:50
  • Fred Schwartz on May Not Renew: Legs look hammered!Dec 6, 22:45
  • NudeWorldOrder on Ariel: Works for me. It’s actually quite plausibly what Disney would do (if they were doing PN princesses at all of course) since IRL there seems to be a trend towards older princesses as attitudes change (Elsa’s 21!) But for multiple reasons I don’t see a problem here. Not only is the picture completely innocent, but she is of course a mermaid, not a human. And mermaids have been depicted as not wearing clothes forever, including in the original, pre-Disney telling of this story.Dec 6, 18:30
  • cato on Ariel: Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time. You seem to have a problem with underage depictions being behind a simple click, yet no problem with slow drivers blocking the passing lane (which results in the person passing on the right getting a ticket). Please exp[lain how a simple click is equal to the government issuing traffic tickets, fining the citizens for infractions?Dec 6, 18:01
  • MLC777 on HR to PA: In the NWO world… it would be absolutely acceptable/appropriate. In the current real world, it would likely be the end of his career and a serious roadblock for any future meaningful career.Dec 6, 17:57
  • cato on Naked Aunt 2: That is the point! great timingDec 6, 17:57
  • Anon and On on Ariel: Cato would make a good cop at a speed trap, sitting there waiting to bust drivers for no tag light, or following too closely, or driving (not speeding) in the left lane, or failing to turn on headlights as soon as dusk falls, or…Dec 6, 16:53
  • cato on Ariel: Nudist magazines used to show children all the time. Simple nudity is fine. I’ve nothing against naturism/nudism. They very much monitor what they allow in their magazines, websites, and even their campgrounds. Any hint of sexualizing the nudity is forbidden. Thus children are allowed. It is the sex, not the nudity. Two totally different things. Sites like NWO try to normalize nudity, and that’s a wonderful thing. But there are posts being more sexual in nature. I’ve no problem with that either. However, to then introduce children into the mix? Nope!Dec 6, 16:27
  • cato on Ariel: Hit the “random” link sometime. Way too many old posts to go one by one. Sometimes a nice post, or sometimes something I dislike. Sometimes a more controversial post. More recently NWO placed a similar post behind an extra click. Re-read my previous post. All I did was to identify the character. You seem to be the one passing judgement where none was given, but since you did, here’s my take on depicting children on a website devoted towards many sexual references: The two should never be mixed. Not in real life. Not in fantasies. Not in art. Not in cartoons. The reason is that such websites attract undesireables. Will they comment to their perverted desires? Will they start submitting images ever so closer to that fantasy they hold. Such tolerances invite the camel’s nose into the tent. That is for NWO to decide when or if to draw line. For me, I prefer a bit of consistency. Place one underage anime behind an extra click? Why not place this one behind another click?Dec 6, 16:22
  • justcantgetitup on HR to PA: It’s a serious character flaw in that the CEO is using his position of power just so he can get off on looking at naked breasts. If he doesn’t own the business himself, I wonder if the owners and the shareholders would deem this an appropriate use of company funds?Dec 6, 15:17
  • justcantgetitup on Ariel: Times change. Up until 2003 it was legal for Page 3 girls aged 16 and 17 to appear topless in UK newspapers. I’m sure that this would be a reboot of Ariel to comply with contemporary laws.Dec 6, 15:11
  • GOWK24 on Naked Aunt 1: Well, him being attracted to a blood relative is ICKY. Him being attracted to his uncle’s young, sexy wife that he has no real connection to? Much more “normal” and less taboo. Not trying to make a issue out of it, doesn’t really matter, no. Just more curious of the context and what not.Dec 6, 13:10
  • GOWK24 on Ariel: Cato I have to ask: Do you just go back and troll on old posts for kicks? That being said, I have no objection whatsoever to topless mermaids or nude cartoons. BUT, I agree that since Ariel from Little Mermaid was always depicted as being under 18, it’s pretty awkward for her to be topless or nude. So I agree that is creepy in that context but…A, it is a cartoon and B you had to specifically go back to find an old, out of date post to make the comment at all. Not trying to be rude to you or anyone else but…maybe you need to find something more useful to occupy your time then back-tracking to make complaints on a blog that never intended to do any harm?Dec 6, 13:06
  • Ryan on Ariel: If it’s a problem for you, you can just suspend your disbelief a little further by pretending they increased her age to 18 when they “updated” her. Because she’s not real either way, so nobody is being harmed.Dec 6, 12:43
  • cato on Ariel: I asked Google… As depicted in the 1989 film, Ariel is the youngest of King Triton’s seven daughters, and is 16-years-old. Ariel has a vast fascination with the world of humans, despite contact being forbidden by her father, Triton, who hates humans. Ariel | The Little Mermaid | FandomDec 6, 10:44
  • MLC777 on HR to PA: What a waste. For a CEO to request a topless PA in the NWO world is a most serious character flaw. PA to a CEO should definitely be a full (perhaps even strict) PN position.Dec 6, 08:35
  • MLC777 on May Not Renew: This one needs a new tag: “bad attitude.” The thought of someone getting off in response to your naked body should be considered among the highest of honors, not something to get freaked out over.Dec 6, 08:28
  • Mariner77 on Naked Aunt 1: No, we don’t. Does it matter? If so, I am thinking she might be Zack’s mom’s younger sister. Does that answer the question?Dec 6, 06:32
  • GOWK24 on Naked Aunt 1: It really begs the question if she’s Zack’s aunt by blood or by marriage. Possibly we find out in Part 2?Dec 5, 16:08
  • Anon and On on Naked Aunt 1: Zack is about to become the most popular boy in school…Dec 5, 13:03
  • Mariner77 on Look At Me, John: I would love to have naked amazons arrive at my house, when can they get here? Only if they are friendly, though.Dec 5, 04:09
  • justcantgetitup on Unique Penalty: What sort of fowl was it? Chicken, duck, turkey? Is the coach a veggie or something. Imagine being the unfortunate player who has to head that ball afterwards when there’s possibly the trace of her faeces on it…Dec 5, 03:32
  • Danel on Hide and Seek: It’s quite normal and pleasant to have dirty feet, especially soles, when living barefoot and fully naked !Dec 5, 02:32
  • Fred Schwartz on Unique Penalty: You might want to get a different angle on your camera, or better lighting. It looks like an elephant’s trunk.Dec 5, 00:34
  • That Lesbian Nudist Cult on Look At Me, John: I think it’s the one where all players must wear a mask, it begins with everyone singing a song, and it’s got rules that change in every game…Dec 4, 22:19
  • That Lesbian Nudist Cult on Look At Me, John: Or better yet, have sex DURING the game. Rule should be no one can climax until a point is scored by your team. Hold on, I should write this down. This could make for a good story. And nobody take it, or else some naked amazons will show up at your house and kick your ass!Dec 4, 22:15
  • Leeb29 on Look At Me, John: Pfft. If she’s going to make you stop watching your favorite sport, break up with her and find someone who likes the same sport you do. You can have sex after the game.Dec 4, 22:00
  • Megamegatron99 on Look At Me, John: I saw this video the other day, and it feels kinda relevant to this particular caption https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a8UqhEMgGgDec 4, 17:48
  • Fred Schwartz on Hide and Seek: Next time send her up the tree with a handy wipe to clean up her dirty feet.Dec 4, 16:46
  • Fred Schwartz on Look At Me, John: Football? Is that the game with bat and a net? I’m game for an alternative, but the mismatched, ratty socks have got to go.Dec 4, 16:41
  • Bill on Look At Me, John: This would be me except with the gym. And my lady would surprise me with my fetish too, and by the time we’d both had our fun the gym would be closed.Dec 4, 16:34
  • GOWK24 on Look At Me, John: Hey Amy? I hate Football. winks suggestivelyDec 4, 16:20
  • Anonymous on Fitting Room: This actually makes sense and isn’t completely outlandish: 1. If all shoppers deposit all their clothes and belongings into a locker before entering a mall, then there’s virtually no chance for theft from the shopper or the mall. 2. Why do people constantly go into a room to undress, undress, dress in new clothes, undress, dress back in your old clothes, go outside to pick new clothes and then repeat the process?Dec 4, 13:24
  • Mariner77 on Hide and Seek: Should I have arranged the pictures the other way round?Dec 4, 06:07
  • NudeWorldOrder on Fitting Room: Perhaps you remembered it, but I did a caption on a store that worked that way too, and I have to say that policy makes more sense. If dressing rooms aren’t for undressing in private, why have them at all?Dec 4, 00:40
  • MLC777 on Hide and Seek: She’s in the process of climbing and hasn’t gotten to her actual hiding place yet.Dec 3, 19:41
  • MLC777 on Fitting Room: That is actually an excellent policy. It should be the policy of all clothing stores. Even better would be to provide lockers in the entryway and require all clothing be deposited when entering the store. In fact, do that with all stores, not just clothing stores. With shopping malls, it could be implemented on a collective basis at the mall entrances. I would definitely support such policy in the real world.Dec 3, 19:38
  • Some Guy on Hide and Seek: That’s some serious motivation to seek!Dec 3, 15:53
  • Mike on Hide and Seek: Ah, but everyone looking for her will be looking from below.Dec 3, 14:36
  • Sigma on Hide and Seek: Probably shouldn’t be sticking her ass in the air if she wants to avoid detectionDec 3, 14:33
  • NudeWorldOrder on Passport Trouble: My intention was that it was like a visa stamp or something, not the passport itself.Dec 2, 19:27
  • Steven on Passport Trouble: Serves her right for having a passport in a language she can’t read.Dec 2, 18:42
  • Womble on Ladybirds: I just googled them I wasn’t actually expecting them to actually topless but yeah they are a topless female band coolDec 2, 14:01
  • justcantgetitup on Come on, Cindy: Looks like a plot for a strip game loser video, “Cindy” is being taken outside to do some forfeits…Dec 1, 13:30
  • NudeWorldOrder on Topless Basketball: That concern might be part of the reason this team decided not to go full nude. But I imagine they would do something to distinguish the times, could be a simple as colored ribbons around the waist.Dec 1, 10:08
  • Anonymous on How I’m Doing: This one is duplicated with this https://nudeworldorder.net/blog/21067/Dec 1, 08:25
  • justcantgetitup on Travelers Beware: Harsh but accurate.Dec 1, 06:19
  • relpugnum on Topless Basketball: Now I’m curious what happens if you have two all-nude teams playing each other. With no uniforms to distinguish who’s on which team, it seems like it would be pretty confusing to watch. Fun, but hard to follow.Dec 1, 03:10
  • NudeWorldOrder on Objection: I’m sure you’re right. They just haven’t got around to updating they sign to say “Unregistered Nudity Prohibited”. They really should though, I could see a sign like that causing some confusion.Nov 30, 16:30
  • NudeWorldOrder on Passport Trouble: Yeah, me too. It’s quite strange.Nov 30, 16:27
  • P_P on Passport Trouble: This is one of those pictures where I wonder what was really happening.Nov 30, 15:48
  • cato on Objection: The restriction applies to those not registered or not serving a judicial sentence. Clearly, registered PNs are exempted.Nov 30, 14:33
  • Ger68 on Travelers Beware: In Germany such a girl is called “Tischlerstochter” = “carpenter’s daughter” because she is “planed at front and back” Or newer BMW = “Brett mit Warzen” = “board with nipples”Nov 30, 05:18
  • GOWK24 on Birthday Chat: Definitely!Nov 29, 18:47
  • nudist rebel on Topless Basketball: Free tits when running and jumping? But that’s the best part! 😉Nov 29, 14:18
  • Dimmesdale on Travelers Beware: Rather than “Hahaha!” in the last line, perhaps it should say “Mwahaha!”Nov 29, 13:30
  • NudeWorldOrder on Travelers Beware: Now I’ve usually said you have to register in person to avoid just this kind of thing, but since it mentioned travel, perhaps some countries are not quite so careful. Definitely something to watch out for if you’re not cool with spending a long time naked unexpectedly.Nov 29, 12:51
  • NudeWorldOrder on Birthday Chat: Thanks. Yes it definitely is an old one, but I had kind of forgotten about it myself. I should use that chat template again sometime.Nov 29, 10:54
  • Amy on Discussion: As long as other people are doing it to, like topless or something, I’m fine with doing it btwNov 29, 09:04
  • Amy on Discussion: I like that 🙂 Yeah, nudity is not a sexual thing for me, I just like sitting around at home with nothing on when I can or going for a walk in the woods behind the house with nothing or next to nothing on cause I feel closer to nature. I get embarassed tho if I even think someone else might have seen me, and I know it comes from the shame of a lifetime of being taught to be ashamed of “what people might see”, you know?Nov 29, 09:03
  • GOWK24 on Birthday Chat: This is a “Classic”? Funny I don’t remember seeing it before. Glad you reposted, it’s an awesome entry.Nov 28, 20:10
  • Artzival on Birthday Chat: Wow great post Nudeworldorder! Would love more of theseNov 28, 17:15
  • Mike on Five-Finger Discount: She will register.Nov 28, 16:31
  • GOWK24 on Five-Finger Discount: If only she had thought of going nude sooner. Instead, now she has a criminal record.Nov 28, 16:19
  • NudeWorldOrder on Bikini Confusion: According to Wikipedia the original monokini was a little bit more modest, and had straps for some reason, although it was indeed topless all the same. Also an interesting linguistic fact, although bikini → monokini seems logical, it’s kind of a back-formation, because kini doesn’t mean swimsuit or anything. Bikinis were actually named after Bikini Atoll, a nuclear test site, of all things. (And presumed home of Spongebob Squarepants)Nov 28, 14:20
  • Amazing Dough on Prepared for Fun: maybe she has dissociative identity disorderNov 28, 10:19
  • nudist rebel on Discussion: Cato summed it up quite nicely. I’d add just a few things: It’d be cool if the first step was hers, I wouldn’t like to force someone into something they don’t really want to. It could be her first time nude, she could be shy, but nudity is part of her personality. Otherwise she would get dressed at the first opportunity. You know, our world is so clothes-minded that even the word “naked” is used to mean “underwear” sometimes, people are afraid of being seen naked in their own homes etc. She could be shy or need a little support from others or myself. We all need some encouragement even for things we really want to do deep inside. I’m a like that too that’s why I’d like to have PN laws so that I (or we, as a couple) could make my mind just once and from then on I could say: “Sorry, I know this is a conservative professional setting, but I can’t get dressed. I’m registered, it’s the law”. I don’t like being forced into things unless it was something I secretly wished to begin with 😉 Then there’s the wow-factor: meeting someone for the first time, nude, free, and unashamed is like seeing a unicorn, a magical being, superior to all these mundane things we humans call “clothing”. It’s not the same as a porn star that tries too hard to look sexy or a girl that only gets naked for sex and gets dressed afterwards. It’d be just her being herself, nude, acting naturally among other people.Nov 28, 10:07
  • justcantgetitup on Bikini Confusion: Elsewhere the monokini has evolved from that to be something which actually covers the nipples, bottom and “lady bits” but is far skimpier and more revealing than a traditional one piece swimsuit. Either way, she’s done it “accidentally on purpose” to enjoy top freedom.Nov 28, 09:53
  • justcantgetitup on Topless Basketball: Of course you’re happy but I can imagine some of the bigger-breasted girls won’t be too thrilled about not having support for them whilst running and jumpingNov 28, 09:35
  • Amy on Discussion: Makes sense 🙂 I’m not the submissive type but for me I’m so shy I’d have to be forced or coerced into it to maintain my public nudity, like consensual but I’d be reluctant around a lot of people or somewhere wildly public.Nov 28, 09:09
  • NudieTales on Tech Startup: Nude-in-public.com, Zuzana D.Nov 28, 08:17
  • No on Prepared for Fun: That’s a mirror, not a second person.Nov 28, 04:11
  • Danel on Persona: What about video conferences ?Nov 28, 03:47
  • Danel on Bikini Confusion: Indeed, this is not called a bikini but a “monokini” (at least in France), because made of one part and not two !Nov 28, 03:38
  • aaah on Tech Startup: damn do you know where the original video came from? this is amazingNov 28, 03:30
  • cato on Important Meeting: Whatever “leading the company” means, if there is a board of directors, everyone reports to the Board, including the president of the Board. I know this, for I twas one. To change the eligibility of electing Board members requires the Board to change the bylaws. Nothing happens by decree of one person. Even a majority share owner has to go through the Board to affect changes to the bylaws. All the majority shareholder can do is vote out Board members and vote in members agreeing with their changes. Lastly, it is illegal to discriminate against PN, but wouldn’t the courts find discriminating against non-nudes a questionable legality issue, too? Board members are generally not employees. A different set of standards apply to them. Having your front line managers serving on the Board is foolish, not illegal.Nov 27, 21:44
  • NudeWorldOrder on Important Meeting: Why would it be?Nov 27, 18:42
  • NudeWorldOrder on Uneven: That’s how I took it. Since that would mean she’s not exposed voluntarily, it could be that her nervousness about this is coming out as obsession over tan lines.Nov 27, 18:40
  • NudeWorldOrder on Magical Girls: I actually considered that. Obviously “magical girls” are not part of the the NWO universe, but it does mention nude sentences, which sounds like my setting, so I decided the best way to look at it might be as in-universe media.Nov 27, 18:35
  • name5000 on Mission Accomplished: https://nudeworldorder.net/blog/24422/#commentsNov 27, 17:40
  • name5000 on Important Meeting: thats uh…. illegal, right?Nov 27, 17:07
  • name5000 on Bad Magician: if the pants were a different colour, that magicians outfit would be VERY coolNov 27, 17:01
  • name5000 on Uneven: what sort of situation would you she in to be mocked? is she registering?-if so wouldnt the pns be understanding? skinny dipping?-wouldnt tanlines be normal for that? sex?-a person who would mock you for tanlines isnt a good person to be with sexually. what is happening in the image??? its probably a bottomless sentence, right? that would make the most senseNov 27, 16:56
  • name5000 on Magical Girls: aside from the other arguments,, should this be marked alt?Nov 27, 16:40
  • cato on Magical Girls: That is much clearer than your first attempt. Thanks for the clarification.Nov 26, 18:22
  • Anonymous on Passport Trouble: But she’s so hot already. I’ll warm you up the old fashion way.Nov 26, 17:46
  • justcantgetitup on Magical Girls: Good God Cato! That’s probably the exact OPPOSITE of what I was trying to say! I took it as the characters had NATURALLY aged to adulthood BEFORE reprising their roles for an illustration that had been created ELEVEN years later in 2022! As for implying that I would approve of child pornography in any way, shape or form well I’m absolutely flabbergasted! You’re not just barking up the wrong tree you’re not even in the right forest! Let’s get this right. I’m imagining characters that have ALREADY AGED TO ADULTHOOD as opposed to photoshopped pictures of children. Photographing children in that way is WRONG under ANY circumstances imho.Nov 26, 14:09
  • cato on Discussion: I can’t speak for “nudist rebel” however, I would share the same feeling. If a woman were to register PN just because I wanted her to do so, she is making me the one responsible for that decision. If she hates the consequences of that decision, she will resent me for it. If a woman is already a PN, I can admire her in more ways. She made a decision on her own, for herself. I can be there to support her in whatever consequences, good or bad, that may come of it. I prefer strong, independent women, rather than a submissive ones. Especially in this universe of PN that had been around for awhile.Nov 26, 12:31
  • cato on Magical Girls: CP = child porn Your original post stated that the characters aged to adulthood after the illustration was made; therefore, we should be fine with the illustration being they are now adults. I compared that to real children being photographed, but aging to adulthood. Does that make the original photograph okay in your mind? That’s the logic I saw from your post.Nov 26, 12:24
  • Anonymous on College Visit 1: With that bush, she’s really only topless imo. I support a topless friendly campus.Nov 26, 11:18
  • Amy on Discussion: Curious why you’d prefer to meet an already nude girl over convincing your own gf to go nude? I get when you say you just want your gf to be pretty and the prettiest she can be is when she’s naked, I totally don’t understand why most men have a problem with that is all. Maybe I just don’t get it cause I’m a woman shrugNov 26, 09:42
  • Amy on Discussion: It’s kinda cool there are really people who would 🙂Nov 26, 09:37
  • justcantgetitup on Magical Girls: I don’t understand your first paragraph.Nov 26, 08:51
  • Womble on Magical Girls: Okay fair enoughNov 26, 08:38
  • cato on Magical Girls: yes, it is. There still exists between what is legal and what is right. Also, there is room between what is right and what is wise.Nov 26, 06:38

DMCA / Report Abuse