Hater’s gonna hate.
I suggest you reread parts 1, 2, and 3 more carefully. Unless you consider a kiss under the mistletoe (a holiday convention here) sexual abuse, “Uncle” Stephen (related by friendship, not blood) has behaved as a perfect gentleman. Yes he has looked at this gorgeous nude woman who is young enough to be his daughter but really can you blame him? Aren’t you looking at her? The way I read the story is she has a “crush” on him. I am looking forward to seeing what happens in part 4 and I would be happy if this beautiful lady decides to share her lovely body with this lonely lifelong friend.
Thank-you Josh, you may be rewarded. It is interesting to see how different people interpret the same thing in different ways. I wonder whether that is because of their upbringing, experiences or education.
Some of these come across as kind of sexually-harrassy or rapey which isn’t really a comfortable feeling, but maybe the next part will clear things up.
I’ll be honest and say I think part 2 was the creepiest. Her details of “uncle” Stephen while she was a teenager is full of red flag and probably the worst part so far.
Maybe the punchline is that he will turn up at her door with Bible in one hand and Crucifix in the other, urging her to turn to God. Maybe in the past he wasn’t perving on her, merely praying for her soul.
I know some will find this (and 4th and final part) creepy, but don’t forget it was previously established that “Uncle” Stephen is not actually a blood relative.
Hater’s gonna hate.
I suggest you reread parts 1, 2, and 3 more carefully. Unless you consider a kiss under the mistletoe (a holiday convention here) sexual abuse, “Uncle” Stephen (related by friendship, not blood) has behaved as a perfect gentleman. Yes he has looked at this gorgeous nude woman who is young enough to be his daughter but really can you blame him? Aren’t you looking at her? The way I read the story is she has a “crush” on him. I am looking forward to seeing what happens in part 4 and I would be happy if this beautiful lady decides to share her lovely body with this lonely lifelong friend.
Thank-you Josh, you may be rewarded. It is interesting to see how different people interpret the same thing in different ways. I wonder whether that is because of their upbringing, experiences or education.
From Part 2:
“I have known him since I was about ten. He has ‘liked me quite strongly’ for as long as I can remember…”
He is a pedo.
So she’s…interested in Stephen now?
Some of these come across as kind of sexually-harrassy or rapey which isn’t really a comfortable feeling, but maybe the next part will clear things up.
I’ll be honest and say I think part 2 was the creepiest. Her details of “uncle” Stephen while she was a teenager is full of red flag and probably the worst part so far.
Maybe the punchline is that he will turn up at her door with Bible in one hand and Crucifix in the other, urging her to turn to God. Maybe in the past he wasn’t perving on her, merely praying for her soul.
I know some will find this (and 4th and final part) creepy, but don’t forget it was previously established that “Uncle” Stephen is not actually a blood relative.
honestly that doesn’t make this series much better..
Still a pedo fantasy serial, relative or not. You need to get rid of this shit.