their parents can “punish” them for things like not like not cleaning their rooms or leaving out dishes, or literally any chore. As long as they don’t do said chore their parents have a right to dish out bottomless punishments indefinably.
They don’t even need any particular excuse. The issue is that parents can only enforce nudity on dependent children, so if the girls were all earning a decent salary as models for an apparently now very successful company, they couldn’t really be claimed as dependents anymore. Exact details probably vary, but presumably they did their research and found that at least where they live this would have been a problem without the workaround.
They could relocate to a district where employers can inflict bottomless punishments on employees. Or write it into a contract. Or register full PN, with a modeling exception specifically for these outfits. Or some such arrangement.
I hate to be a typo Nazi, but in the white on shaded text, the words “while” and “unfashionable” are clearly inverted.
Also, in the green text, 2nd paragraph, “their moms” should be replaced by “her mom” or “my mom”, since the use of “we” in the first paragraph makes it sound like it’s one of the girls talking… And the text colour should probably be in that girls colour anyway.
…yellow. the “my mom” girl’s text is in yellow, and this technical detail better fits from her pov.
Unfortunately I failed to save an editable version of this one, so I’d have to redo it. I may if I have time, but other than “look while unfashionable”, I’m not sure I follow why you consider those errors. The brunettes are sisters and “their mom” (it doesn’t say moms) is the creator of TieUpz. The blonde girl is talking, and her text is green, same as in the first picture. (Perhaps I should have made it yellow to match her hair, but I didn’t think of that.)
The idea is that since it can only be used as a punishment it can be reserved for offenders who really need to be made an example of. Full nude sentences can easily be played off as voluntary but bottomless let’s everyone know the individual is naked against their will and clearly a criminal.
If you really want to be bottomless you have to commit just the right crime to get the appropriate sentence and hope the judge sentences you the way you intended. Like I said, the intent is that it sets criminals apart from law abiding PNs.
I kind of like that the NWO mimic the real laws in that they are incomplete, have glaring loopholes, and are poorly thought out in terms of social consequences.
I find it a good and needed satire for inequality before the law.
Now we just need to make NWO a mainstream entertainment… Maybe it can be an HBO show?
their parents can “punish” them for things like not like not cleaning their rooms or leaving out dishes, or literally any chore. As long as they don’t do said chore their parents have a right to dish out bottomless punishments indefinably.
They don’t even need any particular excuse. The issue is that parents can only enforce nudity on dependent children, so if the girls were all earning a decent salary as models for an apparently now very successful company, they couldn’t really be claimed as dependents anymore. Exact details probably vary, but presumably they did their research and found that at least where they live this would have been a problem without the workaround.
They could relocate to a district where employers can inflict bottomless punishments on employees. Or write it into a contract. Or register full PN, with a modeling exception specifically for these outfits. Or some such arrangement.
I hate to be a typo Nazi, but in the white on shaded text, the words “while” and “unfashionable” are clearly inverted.
Also, in the green text, 2nd paragraph, “their moms” should be replaced by “her mom” or “my mom”, since the use of “we” in the first paragraph makes it sound like it’s one of the girls talking… And the text colour should probably be in that girls colour anyway.
…yellow. the “my mom” girl’s text is in yellow, and this technical detail better fits from her pov.
#DontBreakMyFantasy
Unfortunately I failed to save an editable version of this one, so I’d have to redo it. I may if I have time, but other than “look while unfashionable”, I’m not sure I follow why you consider those errors. The brunettes are sisters and “their mom” (it doesn’t say moms) is the creator of TieUpz. The blonde girl is talking, and her text is green, same as in the first picture. (Perhaps I should have made it yellow to match her hair, but I didn’t think of that.)
I find it wild that there is no way to sign up for permanently bottomless.
that’s something I’ve never liked about NWO though it’s no biggie
The idea is that since it can only be used as a punishment it can be reserved for offenders who really need to be made an example of. Full nude sentences can easily be played off as voluntary but bottomless let’s everyone know the individual is naked against their will and clearly a criminal.
What if someone only wants to be bottomless though?
If you really want to be bottomless you have to commit just the right crime to get the appropriate sentence and hope the judge sentences you the way you intended. Like I said, the intent is that it sets criminals apart from law abiding PNs.
There’s also the bogus NUMA route.
I kind of like that the NWO mimic the real laws in that they are incomplete, have glaring loopholes, and are poorly thought out in terms of social consequences.
I find it a good and needed satire for inequality before the law.
Now we just need to make NWO a mainstream entertainment… Maybe it can be an HBO show?
Or they could get caught violating these rules and be punished with a legal bottomless sentence.
and risk getting a full nude sentence and no way to model the new fashion.
I’m sure if they are making that much profit, they can afford a good lawyer to negotiate the correct sentence.