The pigtails make her look very young, yes. And the caption plays that up, somewhat. But I don’t believe this is an actual child (IE. anyone under legal age) and I don’t see why there’s much reason to raise a fuss about it. The girl looks to be in her late teens IMO, and face it: some women who are old enough to be finished college can still pass for 16-17 if they try.
No this is not child porn. I don’t see it as porn. Nudism is not porn, it is just not wearing clothes. There is nothing sexual about the photo. There are pictures of children much young than her on resort websites. They aren’t porn, either
Prostate cancer, put it in my sex life
Huh?
The pigtails make her look very young, yes. And the caption plays that up, somewhat. But I don’t believe this is an actual child (IE. anyone under legal age) and I don’t see why there’s much reason to raise a fuss about it. The girl looks to be in her late teens IMO, and face it: some women who are old enough to be finished college can still pass for 16-17 if they try.
Yeah, plus it’s got an FTVGirls watermark. Her name is Aurielee Summers apparently.
I feel invisible. (•́︵•́)
Oops, sorry. Yeah I see you pointed out the same thing. Well, consider it an independent confirmation.
Oh wow, I didn’t even see that. Maybe I’m due for an eye exam?
It’s definitely not that easy to see, someone (not me) obviously downsized it.
Is this what child porn looks like?
No this is not child porn. I don’t see it as porn. Nudism is not porn, it is just not wearing clothes. There is nothing sexual about the photo. There are pictures of children much young than her on resort websites. They aren’t porn, either
Her name is Aurielee Summers. Look her up and stop trolling.