who was not born without an umbilical cord? Adam and Eve. I’ll let you figure which one she is supposed to be. I thought the tanline distracting part would have made this obvious. I guess not.
Why would Eve have any tanlines? Ergo, tanlines are distracting to her costume. It really takes away from the post if someone else has to explain every detail to you. Some things you should just let them go over your head and move along, imho
You know, I appreciate that you got it, but there’s really no need to be snide to someone who didn’t. I made it a little cryptic on purpose. The answer’s in the filename, like Mega said, but not everyone’s gonna look at that.
If you’ve never encountered the concept of an Adam/Eve costume before I imagine it’s pretty tough.
Not being snide. Being direct. There is a world of difference. Just preaching the Gospel… “Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.” (Proverbs 17:28)
Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. We ought not suppress it here of all places.
And who amongst us here have never dreamt of an Adam and Eve costume? I suppose many would bare their navel in ignorance. But to lack one? That ought to be eye catching, and make the viewer ponder why no navel? Instead, they reach for their keyboard to be spoonfed the answer, then dislike being told. What a world we live in these days.
There’s also a world of difference between suppressing freedom of speech and asking you to be a bit nicer, which is all I’m doing, in case I wasn’t clear.
Believe me, it’s pretty rare I delete anything aside form spam or double-posts. But still, I’d like to keep this a friendly community as much as possible without resorting to heavy-handed moderation.
took me a moment to realize the lack of a bellybutton (that’s what she is referring to) and now that I noticed, the file name makes more sense now
And no bellybutton is supposed to be who?
who was not born without an umbilical cord? Adam and Eve. I’ll let you figure which one she is supposed to be. I thought the tanline distracting part would have made this obvious. I guess not.
I didn’t notice until I read the comments. I thought she was referring to her face makeup and nails looking nice.
Why is it obvious? A costume that would win the most convoluted costume contest.
Why would Eve have any tanlines? Ergo, tanlines are distracting to her costume. It really takes away from the post if someone else has to explain every detail to you. Some things you should just let them go over your head and move along, imho
You know, I appreciate that you got it, but there’s really no need to be snide to someone who didn’t. I made it a little cryptic on purpose. The answer’s in the filename, like Mega said, but not everyone’s gonna look at that.
If you’ve never encountered the concept of an Adam/Eve costume before I imagine it’s pretty tough.
Not being snide. Being direct. There is a world of difference. Just preaching the Gospel… “Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.” (Proverbs 17:28)
Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. We ought not suppress it here of all places.
And who amongst us here have never dreamt of an Adam and Eve costume? I suppose many would bare their navel in ignorance. But to lack one? That ought to be eye catching, and make the viewer ponder why no navel? Instead, they reach for their keyboard to be spoonfed the answer, then dislike being told. What a world we live in these days.
There’s also a world of difference between suppressing freedom of speech and asking you to be a bit nicer, which is all I’m doing, in case I wasn’t clear.
Believe me, it’s pretty rare I delete anything aside form spam or double-posts. But still, I’d like to keep this a friendly community as much as possible without resorting to heavy-handed moderation.