Most likely, yeah. I guess IRL a few places have regulations about swimwear that shows too much ass, but generally there shouldn’t be any problem. Although it’s worth noting that this doesn’t extend to dress codes and the like, as seen here. Her employer or college for instance would still be within their rights to insist she wear something more modest… as long as they’re only talking about her bottom half.
Yeah, and in fact I think twitter allows nudity IRL (there may be some rules about profile pictures and such, but in the actual tweets). So she wouldn’t have needed to register. Perhaps she really just wanted to anyway and was trying to find a reason.
Well Twitter hides “adult” content including nudity. But if she was PN topless then her breasts aren’t indecent and they can be shared like a regular post.
Wouldn’t any bottom be considered legal? So in theory she could go in public like that?
Most likely, yeah. I guess IRL a few places have regulations about swimwear that shows too much ass, but generally there shouldn’t be any problem. Although it’s worth noting that this doesn’t extend to dress codes and the like, as seen here. Her employer or college for instance would still be within their rights to insist she wear something more modest… as long as they’re only talking about her bottom half.
With or without registration, NWO or real world, the more skin a woman shows the better.
Even so, as I’ve said before, just topless is a waste of registration. Of course you should go full PN.
Yeah, and in fact I think twitter allows nudity IRL (there may be some rules about profile pictures and such, but in the actual tweets). So she wouldn’t have needed to register. Perhaps she really just wanted to anyway and was trying to find a reason.
Well Twitter hides “adult” content including nudity. But if she was PN topless then her breasts aren’t indecent and they can be shared like a regular post.
First good argument for the existance of Twitter that I’ve heard so far.