Please, if you’re concerned about an image, give me a link to the actual post, or tell me the title. Any other information about why you think it’s inappropriate would also be appreciated.
Someone sent a report saying “Possible illegal content”, but unfortunately the only other information included was a link to a tag page with 10 different images.
Looking over the page though, I’m guessing it was Ringleader that they found questionable. It’s apparently from a 2003 movie so it should be fine. If the person who submitted the report sees this (they also gave no contact info), please let me know if you meant a different picture or still have reason to believe the image isn’t OK.
Loading Likes...
It’s comforting that you leave an avenue for communication open for things like this. We’re all here to have fun and keeping it fun means we keep it clean and legal.
From the shape of the hips of the female in the foreground, odd are that she is 18, the other two troublemakers are too close to tell their ages, Both look very petite and shorter than the dress adult woman, too hard to tell in that photo. However it’s assumed that they are standing bottomless however the sexual parts are not seen and panties/thongs could be worn but unseen by the angle of the shot…
Off topic, but what’s the source for ringleader?
It’s called “Stalin” apparently. It’s a little bit hard to track down because of course there are several movies by that title. But from what I can tell, it looks like what they used to call an “exploitation film”, i.e. basically porn but with pretensions of being something more.