It’s not really an effective sentence for a woman as it stands. Maybe exposing breasts at the same time might make it more effective but surely a simple bottomless sentence stipulating that tops don’t go below the belly button. It may be more workable as a male sentence but it could possibly become a “flasher’s charter” giving perverts an excuse to get their stuff out. Or maybe it would eliminate flashing as the thrill would go out of it if became common to see men on a Permanently Exposed sentence.
In order to be effective, her exposure needs to be more pronounced.
If she is caught positioning herself to control exposure (as she says here) her punishment should revert to full strict PN for an extended sentence.
Additionally as part of her minimal exposure sentence, she should be required to alter her entire wardrobe, thus creating an expense/hassle to revert back to being covered after her sentence. If a sentence is too easy/convenient, what worth is it?
It’s not really an effective sentence for a woman as it stands. Maybe exposing breasts at the same time might make it more effective but surely a simple bottomless sentence stipulating that tops don’t go below the belly button. It may be more workable as a male sentence but it could possibly become a “flasher’s charter” giving perverts an excuse to get their stuff out. Or maybe it would eliminate flashing as the thrill would go out of it if became common to see men on a Permanently Exposed sentence.
In order to be effective, her exposure needs to be more pronounced.
If she is caught positioning herself to control exposure (as she says here) her punishment should revert to full strict PN for an extended sentence.
Additionally as part of her minimal exposure sentence, she should be required to alter her entire wardrobe, thus creating an expense/hassle to revert back to being covered after her sentence. If a sentence is too easy/convenient, what worth is it?