Her ‘technical’ breach of the rules was noticed, and her outfit was measured. She was shocked to find that they measured everything including the strings. Because of this she was told that the suit was just under six square inches — close enough to be rounded up. As punishment, her clothing allowance was reduced to zero, and the time extended to four years.
The length of the punishment is found by multiplying the current punishment by the number of excess square inches and adding the result to the current penalty. She is considering wearing a tiny g-string that is about two square inches, but if she is caught with that, the penalty will be two times the current four years added on for a total of twelve years. She was warned about this, but I am not sure she has registered just how severe the penalty will be.
There’s been one or two captions before about a school (or maybe parents?) doing that, but this one sounds more like it’s an actual criminal conviction. Could be a foreign country or some kind of experimental program.
Anyway, I agree, it’s a fun variation on the theme. There was also one where a school had a special program for behavior problem students that attached a point value to each item of clothing. Don’t think it’s up on this site yet. I should get it reposted one of these times.
This “bikini” is covering too much. She knows, and admits, that she is (flauntingly) breaking the rules. It’s time for her to be handed a strict PN sentence for the max term.
Personally, I’d be in favor of allowing her to keep wearing this, but practically speaking, she really should cut her losses at this point give up on wearing a top in favor of a bottom that’s slightly less ridiculous. Now she’ll probably just end up naked anyway.
Just think 3 inches will cover most of your male friends
Her ‘technical’ breach of the rules was noticed, and her outfit was measured. She was shocked to find that they measured everything including the strings. Because of this she was told that the suit was just under six square inches — close enough to be rounded up. As punishment, her clothing allowance was reduced to zero, and the time extended to four years.
The length of the punishment is found by multiplying the current punishment by the number of excess square inches and adding the result to the current penalty. She is considering wearing a tiny g-string that is about two square inches, but if she is caught with that, the penalty will be two times the current four years added on for a total of twelve years. She was warned about this, but I am not sure she has registered just how severe the penalty will be.
Interesting concept, reducing the amount of clothes that someone can wear.
There’s been one or two captions before about a school (or maybe parents?) doing that, but this one sounds more like it’s an actual criminal conviction. Could be a foreign country or some kind of experimental program.
Anyway, I agree, it’s a fun variation on the theme. There was also one where a school had a special program for behavior problem students that attached a point value to each item of clothing. Don’t think it’s up on this site yet. I should get it reposted one of these times.
I think she’s safe so long as her bikini is just Photoshop at work.
This “bikini” is covering too much. She knows, and admits, that she is (flauntingly) breaking the rules. It’s time for her to be handed a strict PN sentence for the max term.
Personally, I’d be in favor of allowing her to keep wearing this, but practically speaking, she really should cut her losses at this point give up on wearing a top in favor of a bottom that’s slightly less ridiculous. Now she’ll probably just end up naked anyway.