This kind of speaks to my point about AI in general, actually: who gives a **** about their fingers or toes? She’s naked! Look at her tits, her pussy, her ass! If you can’t focus on, shall we say, the “fun parts” of a naked woman, what are you even doing here? If you are so obsessed with small details that you can’t enjoy the nudity, I think we have a bigger issue than what is or isn’t “real”.
And all that being said, I was pretty sure this woman was real, not AI, just that her fingers and thumbs were bent at an odd angle as she held the book. If it is AI, well so be it, it’s great AI that looks real.
That’s an over simplification of my comment and wasn’t the real intention. All I’m saying is “enjoy the nudity, ignore the minor flaws”. Is that simple enough to avoid further criticism? We’re supposed to be here for fun not to debate fingers on models, read comment after comment, or novels of text on or underneath each post. If you’re not having fun and focusing on trivial things, maybe this isn’t the right place for you.
What fun is it if we can’t lampoon the imperfect technology? It reminds me of the jokes about the old dial up internet access from half a century ago. (Yes, I am that old.)
“Will the thumb on my right hand turn into a finger like yours?” a naked novitiate asked.
“Only if Gaia finds you acceptable,” the priestess replied before beginning to chant.
Folks, if you’re having trouble with the thumb on the right hand, just think about the angle at which it appears in the picture.
This kind of speaks to my point about AI in general, actually: who gives a **** about their fingers or toes? She’s naked! Look at her tits, her pussy, her ass! If you can’t focus on, shall we say, the “fun parts” of a naked woman, what are you even doing here? If you are so obsessed with small details that you can’t enjoy the nudity, I think we have a bigger issue than what is or isn’t “real”.
And all that being said, I was pretty sure this woman was real, not AI, just that her fingers and thumbs were bent at an odd angle as she held the book. If it is AI, well so be it, it’s great AI that looks real.
“What are you, gay?” ahh comment
That’s an over simplification of my comment and wasn’t the real intention. All I’m saying is “enjoy the nudity, ignore the minor flaws”. Is that simple enough to avoid further criticism? We’re supposed to be here for fun not to debate fingers on models, read comment after comment, or novels of text on or underneath each post. If you’re not having fun and focusing on trivial things, maybe this isn’t the right place for you.
What fun is it if we can’t lampoon the imperfect technology? It reminds me of the jokes about the old dial up internet access from half a century ago. (Yes, I am that old.)
That phrase has been disastrous for any kind of porn criticism. It’s the entire reason it has such low standards.
“Will the thumb on my right hand turn into a finger like yours?” a naked novitiate asked.
“Only if Gaia finds you acceptable,” the priestess replied before beginning to chant.
More from the pic-series could be found here
https://www.eroticbeauties.net/pics/psylunar-in-liliths-daughter-by-suicide-girls-227695.html
If you use Google to find her, use:
Psylunar
So it’s legit then. I admit I was doubtful about that hand once it was pointed out… AI is making us paranoid.
how many fingers does she have?
she definitely has more than enough or on the other hand maybe that’s a thumb.
To me that looks like a thumb viewed edge on, partially obscured by the book.
You may have a point. When I sent this in I didn’t notice. To be honest, I wasn’t looking at her fingers . . .