This will definitely cause a argument but in my opinion I really don’t like hair on females from the chin down of course im asexual aromantic so my comment is purely aesthetic
I have to disrespectfully disagree with you there, incel may have simple meant any involuntarily celibate person a few years ago but now it’s just more a description of those 4chan basement dwelling “kill the foods!!” types whereas female is still used as a way to degrade women by those exact basement dweller types, obv not everyone who uses it is one of them, some speak English as a second language or just use male and female as opposed to man and woman, but just saying
Since when has male and female been a derogatory term?
My use of ‘female’ refers strictly to the biological phenotype—the physical ‘shell’—rather than the person’s social identity or consciousness. As an asexual individual, my interest is purely in the aesthetic of the form, not the politics of the label. To infer a specific ideology from a biological descriptor is a logical leap.
And like I mentioned, not everyone does use it in a derogatory way, some like yourself, just use it as a technical term for the whole of the biological sex, my point was more specifically about incel being more of an insult which is simply untrue bc in *some* cases, even if not all, it is used derogatorily, whereas incel is a specific type of person, the sort who do use female as an insult
Not sure I see how that makes it less of an insult. Most if not all insults refer to a “specific type of person”. That said, I do also agree about “females” sounding kinda bad in certain contexts. “Males” isn’t any better. When talking about people, men and women are definitely preferable, unless you specifically need to include children I suppose.
I acknowledge your preference for social descriptors. However, as an asexual individual, I view the human form through a purely aesthetic and biological lens. To me, ‘men’ and ‘women’ are social constructs; ‘male’ and ‘female’ are the physical vessels. We are simply using different dictionaries for the same subject.
That a girl. With this bush you look better without the bikini bottom.
trim the edges to make a neat triangle , it will enhance your bush to a nice bikini
This will definitely cause a argument but in my opinion I really don’t like hair on females from the chin down of course im asexual aromantic so my comment is purely aesthetic
My only issue with your comment is the use of “females” like that. It’s dehumanising and makes you look like an incel.
You are being over-sensitive.
“Incel” is mote of a slur then “female” is.
I have to disrespectfully disagree with you there, incel may have simple meant any involuntarily celibate person a few years ago but now it’s just more a description of those 4chan basement dwelling “kill the foods!!” types whereas female is still used as a way to degrade women by those exact basement dweller types, obv not everyone who uses it is one of them, some speak English as a second language or just use male and female as opposed to man and woman, but just saying
Since when has male and female been a derogatory term?
My use of ‘female’ refers strictly to the biological phenotype—the physical ‘shell’—rather than the person’s social identity or consciousness. As an asexual individual, my interest is purely in the aesthetic of the form, not the politics of the label. To infer a specific ideology from a biological descriptor is a logical leap.
And like I mentioned, not everyone does use it in a derogatory way, some like yourself, just use it as a technical term for the whole of the biological sex, my point was more specifically about incel being more of an insult which is simply untrue bc in *some* cases, even if not all, it is used derogatorily, whereas incel is a specific type of person, the sort who do use female as an insult
Not sure I see how that makes it less of an insult. Most if not all insults refer to a “specific type of person”. That said, I do also agree about “females” sounding kinda bad in certain contexts. “Males” isn’t any better. When talking about people, men and women are definitely preferable, unless you specifically need to include children I suppose.
I acknowledge your preference for social descriptors. However, as an asexual individual, I view the human form through a purely aesthetic and biological lens. To me, ‘men’ and ‘women’ are social constructs; ‘male’ and ‘female’ are the physical vessels. We are simply using different dictionaries for the same subject.
Here’s how it works. I look past your bush and you look past my gaming. Do we have a deal?