If the hair on women’s heads needs to covered, would that suggest pubic hair must also be covered even if the vulva can or must be visible?
Or since men aren’t supposed to shave their beards, are women also forbidden from shaving?
There are some interesting questions at play here for the NWO universe.
Edit: Based on a quick search, women and men are already allowed, or even recommended, to remove body hair for cleanliness and purity. This plays a role for hygiene and modesty, though in the non-NWO world that also means not leaving the pubic area visible in public. Shaving to selectively create a pattern or solely for appearance is not allowed if it provokes sexual conduct or rejects god.
AI believes that conservative juristic traditions would likely discourage signing up but require obedience to punishments as a trial. Mystical and contextualist traditions would likely view modesty and shame as socially defined, allowing nudity so long as dignity, agency, and legal protections exist for those who are nude. The AI believes it is plausible that, in a cultural context where nudity becomes common and generally desexualized, modesty in Islam could be reinterpreted by many as being specifically about conduct rather than dress. Prayer may require special garments for PNs while traditions catch up to the full commonness of nudity.
A head garment like in the image shifts from being about modesty or avoiding sexual signaling, since those defaults have ideally been removed, to being solely about personal ritual, devotion, and marking one’s identity. It permits participation in the broader culture while still demonstrating the importance of faith to the wearer.
Like many religions, there are traditions that relate to slavery in Islam. Notably, slaves historically may be nude or lightly dressed. Because they had no choice in the matter, it was morally neutral for them to be nude. However, the slave owner had an obligation to provide clothing appropriate for the climate and social norms, though if work was easier to do nude that was allowed. So there was a preference for clothing mainly for dignity, not to constantly hide genitals or avoid sexualization, since non-sexualization of the body was already the default.
Interestingly, Islam historically did not like long incarceration as a punishment. It favored limited public punishments, fines, corporal punishment, or even exile. So nudity as a punishment to shame someone could fit a traditional model, so long as its proportional. AI is claiming that nude punishment as one of multiple punishments offered by a judge could reflect Islamic preference for repentance over coercion. It serves the purposes of social reintegration, visible deterrence, and preserves the individual’s ability to participate in family, work, and religious life.
Minimum registration terms for nudity could be seen as supporting modesty. There’s no “I’m just naked to party but wouldn’t dare be naked at work or the mosque.” You choose to be either clothed or nude all the time and effectively make a statement that your intentions are always modest either way.
I’m not Muslim. I just find it interesting to see how a religion I’m not that familiar with *might* approach the Nude World Order.
If the hair on women’s heads needs to covered, would that suggest pubic hair must also be covered even if the vulva can or must be visible?
Or since men aren’t supposed to shave their beards, are women also forbidden from shaving?
There are some interesting questions at play here for the NWO universe.
Edit: Based on a quick search, women and men are already allowed, or even recommended, to remove body hair for cleanliness and purity. This plays a role for hygiene and modesty, though in the non-NWO world that also means not leaving the pubic area visible in public. Shaving to selectively create a pattern or solely for appearance is not allowed if it provokes sexual conduct or rejects god.
AI believes that conservative juristic traditions would likely discourage signing up but require obedience to punishments as a trial. Mystical and contextualist traditions would likely view modesty and shame as socially defined, allowing nudity so long as dignity, agency, and legal protections exist for those who are nude. The AI believes it is plausible that, in a cultural context where nudity becomes common and generally desexualized, modesty in Islam could be reinterpreted by many as being specifically about conduct rather than dress. Prayer may require special garments for PNs while traditions catch up to the full commonness of nudity.
A head garment like in the image shifts from being about modesty or avoiding sexual signaling, since those defaults have ideally been removed, to being solely about personal ritual, devotion, and marking one’s identity. It permits participation in the broader culture while still demonstrating the importance of faith to the wearer.
Like many religions, there are traditions that relate to slavery in Islam. Notably, slaves historically may be nude or lightly dressed. Because they had no choice in the matter, it was morally neutral for them to be nude. However, the slave owner had an obligation to provide clothing appropriate for the climate and social norms, though if work was easier to do nude that was allowed. So there was a preference for clothing mainly for dignity, not to constantly hide genitals or avoid sexualization, since non-sexualization of the body was already the default.
Interestingly, Islam historically did not like long incarceration as a punishment. It favored limited public punishments, fines, corporal punishment, or even exile. So nudity as a punishment to shame someone could fit a traditional model, so long as its proportional. AI is claiming that nude punishment as one of multiple punishments offered by a judge could reflect Islamic preference for repentance over coercion. It serves the purposes of social reintegration, visible deterrence, and preserves the individual’s ability to participate in family, work, and religious life.
Minimum registration terms for nudity could be seen as supporting modesty. There’s no “I’m just naked to party but wouldn’t dare be naked at work or the mosque.” You choose to be either clothed or nude all the time and effectively make a statement that your intentions are always modest either way.
I’m not Muslim. I just find it interesting to see how a religion I’m not that familiar with *might* approach the Nude World Order.